EM Equity Indices & Global Risk Sentiment
· Updated daily
As of Jun 2026, Nikkei 225 trades at 66,020 (+71.16% year-over-year), Hang Seng at 24,718 (+26.61%), and MSCI EM at 67.9 (+62.55%). The composite EM equity regime is classified as Strong Risk-On. These three indices were chosen to triangulate global EM risk sentiment: Nikkei 225 captures BOJ policy and yen-carry-trade unwinds (the August 2024 deleveraging episode was a textbook example); Hang Seng reflects Hong Kong and China sentiment and is the gateway to the largest USDT corridor in Asia; MSCI EM is the broad benchmark used by global allocators. When EM equities sell off broadly, stablecoin demand historically benefits through both flight-to-quality flows into USD and accelerated dollarization in stressed EM corridors. Source: Yahoo Finance via macro_rates table. Daily from Jan 2020.
EM Equities (Normalised) vs Stablecoin Supply ($B)
Three EM equity indices re-based to 100 at the start of the observation window on the left axis for direct cross-comparison. Total stablecoin market cap in billions of dollars on the right axis. Watch for divergence: when stablecoin supply rises while EM equities sell off, dollarization flows are the likely driver; when all four lines move together, broad risk-on/off sentiment dominates.
Individual Index Levels
Raw index levels per series (each on its own logical scale via the normalised dataset above, but shown here at native levels for context). Useful for spotting acute single-index episodes — the August 2024 Nikkei drop, the 2021–2022 HSI crash on China property concerns, the 2022–2023 MSCI EM bottoming around the Fed pivot.
Constructive global risk sentiment supports both EM equity flows and crypto. This is the canonical bullish backdrop — Fed easing, weak dollar, capital seeking yield in EM and digital assets. Stablecoin supply grows organically rather than from dollarization stress.
Stablecoin demand is being driven by dollarization in stressed EM corridors rather than risk appetite. This is the cleanest separation signal: aggregate stablecoin growth despite global risk-off is a leading indicator of acute corridor-specific FX stress.
Risk-on without stablecoin growth typically reflects rate rotation — investors moving from stablecoin yields (DeFi) into higher-beta EM equity exposure. Often coincides with falling real rates that hurt the DeFi-vs-TBill spread that drives stablecoin demand.
Aggressive Fed tightening or global flight-to-quality. Strong dollar pressures EM equities and crypto simultaneously. Stablecoin supply contracts as both DeFi demand and risk-on capital exit. Corridor-specific dollarization may still rise but is masked by the aggregate decline.
Index sources: Nikkei 225 (Yahoo ticker ^N225), Hang Seng Index (^HSI), iShares MSCI EM ETF (EEM, used as a tradable proxy for the MSCI EM index). All sourced via Yahoo Finance and stored in the macro_rates table. Daily closing values.
Normalisation: For cross-comparison the normalised chart re-bases each series to 100 at the first date in the observation window. This isolates relative performance from absolute level differences (Nikkei ~40k vs MSCI EM ETF ~50). Use the per-index level chart for native-scale context and single-index events.
Why these three: Nikkei captures BOJ policy and yen-carry-trade unwinds that produce global deleveraging episodes. Hang Seng captures Hong Kong and China sentiment, with direct relevance to USDT/Asia stablecoin demand. MSCI EM is the global benchmark used by allocators to express broad EM risk. Together they cover Asia developed, Asia EM gateway, and broad EM.
Composite regime: Average 1-year percent change across the three indices. Threshold definitions: >15% Strong Risk-On, 0% to 15% Risk-On, -10% to 0% Mild Risk-Off, <-10% Acute Risk-Off. These thresholds reflect historical operating ranges since 2010.
Update frequency: Daily. All three sources publish at their respective market closes; the macro_rates table consolidates them on the daily Yahoo fetch cron.