Which stablecoin topics the news moved toward, and away from.
Over the last 30 days against the prior 30, Regulation gained the most coverage (+16pp, 12 to 18 headlines) and Cross-Border Payments lost the most (-12pp, 13 to 7 headlines).
Each topic’s share of tagged headlines in the selected window, against its share in the window immediately before it. Share rather than raw counts, because the total volume of stablecoin news moves between periods and a topic can appear in more headlines while accounting for less of the coverage. This measures attention. A topic drawing less coverage is not thereby weaker, cheaper, smaller or in trouble: the news cycle moved, or a single large story dropped out of the window, and neither is evidence about any issuer or asset.
The delta is what the chart draws; the counts are what it came from. At 42 tagged headlines a three-headline move reads as a double-digit shift in share, which is true and worth knowing about in both directions.
| Topic | Change in share | Prior period | This period | Headlines moved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | +16pp | 12 | 18 | +6 |
| Sanctions | +13pp | 5 | 10 | +5 |
| Iran | +12pp | 4 | 9 | +5 |
| Partnership | +10pp | 4 | 8 | +4 |
| US Treasury | +5pp | 2 | 4 | +2 |
| Cross-Border Payments | -12pp | 13 | 7 | -6 |
| Tokenization | -11pp | 6 | 1 | -5 |
| Adoption | -10pp | 11 | 6 | -5 |
| AI Agents | -9pp | 4 | 0 | -4 |
| M&A | -9pp | 4 | 0 | -4 |
What is compared. A topic’s share of tagged headlines in the selected window against its share in the window immediately before, of equal length. Share normalizes for swings in total news volume between the two periods.
Precision. Changes are reported as whole percentage points. This window holds 42 tagged headlines, so one headline moves a topic’s share by about 2.4 points; a figure carried to a tenth would imply a resolution the sample does not have. Each window has its own figure, which is why the tile above changes with the toggle.
Volume floor. A topic appears only if it reached at least 4 headlines in one of the two periods, so a topic going from zero to one is never reported as a surge.
Ties. Ordered by the headline count behind the move, then by name, so the ranking is identical on every build. Where the leaders themselves tie, the sentence at the top names all of them rather than picking whichever sorted first.
What this is not. An attention metric, and nothing more. Less coverage of a topic is not evidence that the issuer, asset, chain or jurisdiction behind it is declining, and no causal or valuation meaning should be read into any movement here.
Updated daily. See the methodology for data sources and coverage.
Each topic’s share of tagged headlines in the last 30 days against its share in the 30 days immediately before. Share rather than raw counts, because the total volume of stablecoin news moves between periods and a topic can appear in more headlines while accounting for less of the coverage.
Because the sample is small enough that a tenth of a point is invented precision. The window compared here holds 42 tagged headlines, so one headline moves a topic’s share by about 2.4 percentage points — and by about 4.3 on the fifteen-day view. The counts beside each row are the firmer figure, and what reads as a twelve-point gain is three headlines.
A topic qualifies only if it reached at least 4 headlines in one of the two periods. That keeps orphans out: a topic going from zero to one headline would otherwise post a large share gain and read as a surge.
They are ordered by the headline count behind the move and then by name, so the ranking is identical on every build. Sorting by the change alone left ties in whatever order the data happened to arrive, and whichever came first read as the bigger mover. Where the leaders themselves tie, the sentence above names all of them rather than picking one.
No, and nothing on this page supports that reading. This is an attention metric. A topic can lose coverage because the news cycle moved, because a single large story dropped out of the window, or because nothing happened that week. None of those is evidence about the price, supply, health or prospects of any issuer, asset or jurisdiction.